Innovative health systems projects.

Authors

Michael Green, Department of Anaesthesiology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Hahnemann University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Mansoor Amad, Department of Surgery, Drexel University College of Medicine, Hahnemann University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Mark Woodland, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Hahnemann University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2-1-2015

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Residency programmes struggle with the systems-based practice and improvement competency promoted by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. The development of Innovative Health Systems Projects (IHelP) was driven by the need for better systems-based initiatives at an institutional level. Our objective was to develop a novel approach that successfully incorporates systems-based practice in our Graduate Medical Education (GME) programmes, while tracking our impact on health care delivery as an academic medical centre.

METHODS: We started the IHelP programme as a 'volunteer initiative' in 2010. A detailed description of the definition, development and implementation of the IHelP programme, along with our experience of the first year, is described. Residents, fellows and faculty mentors all played an important role in establishing the foundation of this initiative. Following the positive response, we have now incorporated IHelP into all curricula as a graduating requirement. IHelP has promoted scholarly activity and faculty mentorship, [and] has improved aspects of patient care and safety

RESULTS: A total of 123 residents and fellows, representing 26 specialties, participated. We reviewed 145 projects that addressed topics ranging from administrative and departmental improvements to clinical care algorithms. The projects by area of focus were: patient care - clinical care, 38 per cent; patient care - quality, 27 per cent; resident education, 21 per cent; and a cumulative 16 per cent among pharmacy, department activities, patient education, medical records and clinical facility.

DISCUSSION: We are pleased with the results of our first year of incorporating a systems-based improvement programme into the GME programmes. This initiative has promoted scholarly activity and faculty mentorship, has improved aspects of patient care and safety, and has led to the development of many practical innovations.

Publication Title

Clin Teach

Volume

12

Issue

1

First Page

17

Last Page

21

Recommended Citation

Green, M., Amad, M., & Woodland, M. (2015). Innovative health systems projects.. Clin Teach, 12 (1), 17-21. Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.towerhealth.org/gme_ob_gyn_res_read/198